Friday, April 19, 2024
HomeCountriesHaitiHaiti: where's the outrage?

Haiti: where’s the outrage?

-

Two Years Later, Where Is The Outrage?* 

By Melinda Miles, Let Haiti Live Founder and Direc­tor, Lethaitilive.org*

There is not enough anger for my anger,

there is not enough grief for my grief.

haiti_blog1As the two-year anniver­sary of the earth­quake approaches, I am find­ing myself with a case of insom­nia. Here I am, enjoy­ing the per­fect Hait­ian win­ter, lying awake with my head filled with thoughts I can’t escape. Sure, it’s nat­ural to reflect on what has hap­pened as another year ends, yet what I can’t seem to get away from is all the things that haven’t happened.

The hun­dreds of thou­sands who haven’t moved out of the camps they set up after the earth­quake, two years ago. The per­ma­nent homes that haven’t been con­structed, hell even the tem­po­rary shel­ters that haven’t been built. The tarps that only last a cou­ple of months yet haven’t been replaced after two years. The jobs that haven’t been cre­ated, the bil­lions that haven’t been spent, the build­ing back bet­ter that appar­ently will never happen.

I am still oved to tears when I watch footage of the camps, and I bite the insides of my cheeks when I walk through those twist­ing paths of mud, those tiny cor­ri­dors that sep­a­rate fam­i­lies sleep­ing in tents two years after the earth­quake. I am heart­bro­ken by the small chil­dren who have spent their entire lives in the sub­hu­man con­di­tions of Haiti’s IDP camps.

This is a reflec­tion, not a news arti­cle or an analy­sis. It is sim­ply my thoughts writ­ten down. When I lie awake at night I feel shame and I feel the weight of not doing more. I work with peo­ple who live in camps, and my part­ners spend their days hold­ing train­ings, mobi­liz­ing, encour­ag­ing those liv­ing in the camps and work­ing in fac­to­ries. We do what we can, but it is not enough.

haiti_blog2I can’t help but dwell on a deci­sion that was made in the first days after the earth­quake, a ter­ri­ble, crim­i­nal, per­haps even evil deci­sion. Because the cat­a­stro­phe had struck an urban area, human rights “experts” who had flown in to over­see the emer­gency response declared that it would not be pos­si­ble to apply Sphere Stan­dards in Haiti. Sphere Stan­dards are the min­i­mum human­i­tar­ian response that peo­ple can expect after a disaster: “The Hand­book puts the right of disaster-affected pop­u­la­tions to life with dig­nity, and to pro­tec­tion and assis­tance at the cen­tre of human­i­tar­ian action. It pro­motes the active par­tic­i­pa­tion of affected pop­u­la­tions as well as of local and national author­i­ties, and is used to nego­ti­ate human­i­tar­ian space and resources with author­i­ties in disaster-preparedness work. The min­i­mum stan­dards cover four pri­mary life-saving areas of human­i­tar­ian aid: water sup­ply, san­i­ta­tion and hygiene pro­mo­tion; food secu­rity and nutri­tion; shel­ter, set­tle­ment and non-food items; and health action.” (Read more here www.sphereproject.org/handbook). This was cer­tainly not the first time that Haitians were given a dif­fer­ent stan­dard, and I’m sure it won’t be the last. But I can’t under­stand why, despite the bil­lions in the pipeline for Haiti’s recov­ery and the exis­tence of a set of human­i­tar­ian stan­dards devel­oped to be uni­ver­sal – cre­ated specif­i­cally to define the response to any dis­as­ter in the world – why these stan­dards were sim­ply tossed aside.

Are Hait­ian lives less valu­able than the lives of peo­ple from other nation­al­i­ties? Of course not, that’s ridicu­lous. To decide that they were less valu­able would be racist, at least. It would even be evil, wouldn’t it?

Yet Haitians were declared to be unwor­thy of apply­ing the uni­ver­sal min­i­mum stan­dards for relief after a dis­as­ter. I’ve heard the argu­ments. I was in the room at sev­eral meet­ings of the United Nations’ Office for the Coor­di­na­tion of Human­i­tar­ian Affairs (OCHA) clus­ters where well-meaning human­i­tar­i­ans explained why they couldn’t, or rather wouldn’t, be apply­ing Sphere Stan­dards. It was an urban dis­as­ter, there wasn’t enough space, the NGOs and agen­cies didn’t have the expe­ri­ence nec­es­sary… the list went on. But the under­ly­ing theme should have been clear to any observer: the will, the effort required to give Haitians min­i­mum stan­dards of relief after the quake, sim­ply didn’t exist.

Much has been said about this but in my opin­ion not nearly enough. Why aren’t we angrier, why aren’t we out­raged? I won­der why the Hait­ian Amer­i­can com­mu­nity isn’t more pissed off that Haitians were given a dif­fer­ent stan­dard than the inter­na­tional min­i­mum. I won­der why all of the NGOs that have a mis­sion to serve the most vul­ner­a­ble haven’t got­ten together and over­thrown the sys­tem that decided the most vul­ner­a­ble Haitians weren’t deserv­ing of what the most vul­ner­a­ble peo­ple from other coun­tries would get in a sim­i­lar situation.

haiti_blog3Adher­ing to Sphere Stan­dards in Haiti would have required inno­va­tion and cre­ativ­ity, but the result would have been the thing every­one claimed to be doing: build­ing back bet­ter. Port-au-Prince didn’t make sense before the quake. Even if it wasn’t built on a pow­er­fully dan­ger­ous fault line, Port-au-Prince was ini­tially built for about 15% of the pop­u­la­tion it had before the earth­quake. There wasn’t ade­quate san­i­ta­tion, drainage, infrastructure.

The over­pop­u­la­tion was a result of a ruinous trend of cen­tral­iza­tion that had been put into motion dur­ing an early 20th Cen­tury occu­pa­tion of Haiti by the U.S. mil­i­tary. This cen­tral­iza­tion of gov­ern­ment, edu­ca­tion, mar­ket and invest­ment over decades had left the rural major­ity with barely the means to sur­vive. Despite some pock­ets of fer­tile land and abun­dance, most of rural Haiti became over­worked and the land exhausted. Trees cut down for fuel and income, chil­dren mal­nour­ished, pub­lic ser­vices nearly non-existent.

The experts, both Hait­ian and for­eign, had no dif­fi­culty in iden­ti­fy­ing these prob­lems after the earth­quake. The cen­tral­iza­tion, the strug­gle for sur­vival for the major­ity of Haitians who were mar­gin­al­ized out­side the cap­i­tal – these themes were repeated through­out the post-disaster needs assess­ment and rebuild­ing plans.

Yet the human­i­tar­ian com­plex, the same one that declared Haitians would not be get­ting the min­i­mum stan­dards of dis­as­ter relief, also decided to ignore the obvi­ous need to move peo­ple out of Port-au-Prince and invest some of the mil­lions and bil­lions they had in chang­ing the warped and unbal­anced ways of the last cen­tury. Indeed, had the NGOs and agen­cies done what was nec­es­sary to meet the Sphere Stan­dards they would have been forced to also do what Haiti has needed for the longest time – decentralization.

Of course Sphere Stan­dards couldn’t be met in the parks and empty lots where peo­ple fled in the hours after the quake. Of course you would have to move them into safer spaces, less likely to flood, large enough for fam­i­lies to have basic min­i­mum space require­ments met. And yes, these relo­ca­tion camps would have cost money – to set up com­mu­nity spaces, recre­ation and edu­ca­tion and mar­ket spaces. But the money was there, hun­dreds of mil­lions of those dol­lars are still there, two years later. And the Haitians who were left home­less by the quake? They are still there, too, in squalid, dan­ger­ous camps in the parks and once-empty lots of Port-au-Prince and its suburbs.

haiti_blog4I watched an inter­view with a for­eign aid worker the other day that made me cringe. He spoke of the need for­eign aid work­ers have to eat at nice restau­rants and have their other “basic” needs met. I won­dered if this was the rea­son the human­i­tar­ian aid com­plex came in and cen­tral­ized the relief efforts. Was it because you can’t find a decent super­mar­ket filled with imported goods out­side the cap­i­tal city? You can’t find a high end Ital­ian restau­rant, or good Chi­nese food if you leave Port-au-Prince, can’t find the nightlife of $80-a-ticket con­certs head­lined by for­eign acts or the lovely swim­ming pools with swim up bars at the fancy hotels. Is this why the aid com­mu­nity based itself in the upscale sub­urbs of Port-au-Prince?

I have used the phrase crim­i­nal neg­li­gence more than once when describ­ing the con­di­tions in the IDP camps. While NGO work­ers claimed peo­ple had other places to go and chose to stay in camps for ser­vices while simul­ta­ne­ously remov­ing those ser­vices, while they seemed to hardly skip a beat while tran­si­tion­ing from a con­ver­sa­tion that jus­ti­fied two tarps per fam­ily as ade­quate emer­gency shel­ter to order­ing a $20 US lunch at a sweet lit­tle café, I had to won­der how so many peo­ple could so blindly repeat the errors that his­tory and an earth­quake had laid bare for us all to learn from. And I won­der, too, why there isn’t more anger to see these mis­takes repeated. Where is the outrage?


* This blog was first published in Let Hait Live

This article is funded by readers like you

Only with regular support can we maintain our website, publish LAB books and support campaigns for social justice across Latin America. You can help by becoming a LAB Subscriber or a Friend of LAB. Or you can make a one-off donation. Click the link below to learn about the details.

Support LAB