Sunday, July 14, 2024
HomeCountriesBrazilCan Lula reinvent himself as an environmentalist?

Can Lula reinvent himself as an environmentalist?


Next week this former industrial worker, who looks exceptionally youthful for his 65 years, will arrive in Copenhagen as one of the most powerful leaders of the emerging world. And his message will be forceful: the serious global climate crisis was caused by the rich developed nations and it is they who must provide, free of charge, the billions of dollars and the clean technology that the main victims of the crisis – the nations in the South — need for mitigation and adaptation.

To give added authority to his demands, Lula will be announcing an ambitious domestic goal:  to reduce by 36%-39% the predicted level of Brazil’s greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. This is an important new development, because Brazil is the world’s fifth largest emitter of greenhouse gases, largely because of the huge areas of forest that it fells each year. And, to show that  Brazil means business, Lula will say that his government has already managed real progress in curbing deforestation: the area of cleared forest dropped to 7,008 sq.kms in the August 2008-July 2009 period, a 45% decline from the same period in the previous year.  Applause all round.

Lula da SilvaIt is a strong message yet something doesn’t ring quite true. Few could doubt Lula’s passionate commitment to ending hunger in Brazil, and during his seven years in office he has lifted 12 million  families out of absolute poverty. It is an impressive feat and the main reason why Lula still is so popular among the electorate. But Lula has never shown any real concern for the environment. Ever since he burst on to the political scene in the late 1970s at the head of a radical urban trade union movement, Lula has defended the need for the Brazilian economy to grow rapidly. Time and again he has brushed aside the concerns of environmentalists who have repeatedly warned him that a headlong rush into development in delicate ecosystems such as the Amazon basin could compromise the country’s long-term sustainability.  But times change and politicians evolve. Has Lula finally grasped the scale of the environmental crisis that Brazil and the world face?

There are reasons to be doubtful. One of Lula’s pet projects has been a large development programme entitled PAC (Programme of Accelerated Growth).  Some of the money has gone into providing rural communities with running water and electricity  – which is something few could argue with. But a large part of  PAC’s US$200bn budget has also funded the construction of  giant hydroelectric power stations and  massive highways in the Amazon basin. The main objective is to provide large mining and gas projects, loggers and agribusiness with the infrastructure they need. While, in theory, it should be possible to carry out such ambitious projects while ensuring that the country’s tough environmental laws are respected, this has never been the case. Ever since the ill-fated decision in the 1970s to build the giant Transamazon Highway across the heart of the Amazon forest, such projects have attracted a huge influx of land speculators, loggers and cattle farmers. These incomers have extracted the valuable timber and slashed-and-burned the forest at will, completely outside the control of the Brazilian state. This has happened just as much under Lula’s government  – perhaps even more – as under previous governments.

One of the PAC-funded projects is a massive 11,000-megawatt hydroelectric power station, called Belo Monte. It will require a dam across the Xingu river in the heart of the Amazon forest and will flood 400 sq. km of land. Indigenous groups, who have been fighting off this dam for over 30 years, are once more up in arms, with Chief Raoni Txukarramae  (befriended by Sting) leading the protests. Another of the projects is a giant highway from the Brazilian state of Acre to the Pacific coast in Peru. The road will make life easier for many isolated communities but it will also provide loggers with a much easy route to Asia – with potentially disastrous results for the Amazon forest.

It seems highly unlikely that Lula – or any subsequent president – can deliver the promised cut in greenhouse gas emissions while pushing ahead with these kinds of development projects. Indeed, official figures produced at the end of November – but not likely to be mentioned by Lula in Copenhagen – show that forest clearance is bounding back with a vengeance. The area of forest cleared from August 2009 to October 2009 – the first three months in this year’s slash-and-burn cycle – was 682 sq. km, a 30% increase on the same period last year. It seems that the environmentalists’ fears are being realised: the earlier decline was not the result of effective government policies, as Lula claims, but were merely a reflection of  the general downturn in the Brazilian economy.

What is needed is a radically different concept of development, in which economic activity occurs only if it respects the constraints of the ecosystem. Indeed, thousands of river communities in the Brazilian Amazon live this way already.  Many were established by rubber tappers brought into the region from the impoverished north-east of the country during the rubber boom in the early 20th century.  They resolved the problem of being single men living alone in the forest by kidnapping women from  indigenous tribes. Anthropologists are now discovering that these women, long seen as passive victims, played a key role in the formation of the new communities. They taught the rubber tappers how to live in harmony with the forest, using it to satisfy their basic food needs while at the same time protecting or even enhancing its biodiversity.

One such community is Mangabal, situated on the western bank of the upper reaches of the Tapajós river, one of the main tributaries of the Amazon. Aware that land thieves were moving into the region, the inhabitants have fought a long battle to win collective rights over the land they occupy. They have nearly succeeded for all that they now need to turn their land into a resex (a conservation unit known as an ‘extractive reserve’) is for Lula to sign the decree. But Lula is refusing to do so: two hydroelectric power stations are planned along the Tapajós river to provide energy for giant aluminium smelters.

Communities like the one in Mangabal have little say in the running of Brazil – and none at all in big international meetings such as the one being held in Copenhagen. Yet their experience is crucial. The Amazon forest is suffering a double whammy: higher average temperatures are drying out the forest and continued deforestation is disrupting rain patterns. Better than anyone else, the communities know how to adapt and how to survive. But these communities are still being evicted to make way for ‘development’ projects. However green Lula’s rhetoric in Copenhagen, there is little indication yet of the massive rethinking of the concept of development that is required to save the forest.

This article was first published in OpenDemocracy on 10 December:

This article is funded by readers like you

Only with regular support can we maintain our website, publish LAB books and support campaigns for social justice across Latin America. You can help by becoming a LAB Subscriber or a Friend of LAB. Or you can make a one-off donation. Click the link below to learn about the details.

Support LAB